Upon turning it on, the Gigabeat displays its menu, which is easy to navigate, selecting through music, pictures, videos, recorded TV shows, and settings. Songs can be organized by title, artist, genre, or playlist. Specific songs are easy to find due to the first letter of the song appearing as you scroll, so that one can stop at the letter the target song begins with. Movie quality is good, as the screen has a resolution of 240x320 pixels, which is good considering its small size. However, the Gigabeat has only 4 GB of storage space, which means that you may have to pick and choose the movies or music that you put on to it.
Unlike Apple's iPod which must use iTunes to sync to a computer, the Gigabeat can use a number of free programs. Windows Media Player is the recommended program to sync the Gigabeat to your PC, but WMP is a frustrating program in general, and thus syncing the Gigabeat can be difficult. However, other programs, such as WinAmp, a free media player from Nullsoft Inc, can manage the files on the Gigabeat with no problems. Furthermore, one can always manually drag files from their computer drive into the Gigabeat directly if neither of these programs are available. Still, with limited space, managing the songs on the Gigabeat can get a bit tedious through any program.
The feature that sets this mp3 player above the rest is its sound quality. Toshiba did not skimp in the electronics, and thus the Gigabeat is able to deliver a full, rich, and accurate sound. In fact, there is a setting called Harmonics, in which the user can select from either none, professional, or dynamic. With either professional or dynamic enabled, the mp3 player is able to bring better sound quality from an mp3 song, which is a format often known for its terrible, terrible quality. Mp3s are highly compressed, which means that lots of the information that was present in the original recording has been omitted so that the file size is smaller. However, the harmonics of the Gigabeat compensates for frequencies that were neglected during compression. It's not a large change at all -- in fact, most users may not notice a difference, but the change is there, and it helps squeeze a bit more sound quality out which otherwise would have been lost. The Gigabeat designers seem to have had sound quality as one of their top priorities, because they did not allow the device to become loud enough to distort. An iPod, for example, will distort above 90% of its volume. Even though this will cause it to become "louder," the last 10% sacrifices sound quality -- something which the iPod isn't really known for anyway. Anyway, the Gigabeat doesn't do this, but it also will not become as loud. While normally not a problem (especially with today's overly compressed music), there are times in which I would have liked a little bit more volume.
Battery life is excellent. Toshiba claims 16 hours of music play time, although I found it to be more around 12-13 hours, depending on listening volume, screen brightness, etc.
The Gigabeat might not be for everyone. Sound quality seems to be of little concern to many people of my generation, and thus probably isn't high on priority lists when considering a new mp3 player. Its incompatibility with Macs and iTunes DRM music will make it a hassle for many to use. However, if you want a solid, reliable product with decent sound quality, then look no further than the Gigabeat. It's relatively cheap at about 100 dollars, and is a great alternative to the iPod. Unfortunately, the Gigabeat is no longer in production, but the specs and features can be seen at the Toshiba Gigabeat Website.
Thank you gadget-paradise.com for the image.
2 comments:
Overall, a very solid review. I liked the fact that you picked a product that wasn't the "in" product, as it offers an alternative for people who may not be interested in the features of an iPhone. Again, you're attacking a niche market, which I think is great to garner additional traffic to your blog. I also like the fact that you took time to really dissect this product, looking at in terms of music quality and most importantly, evaluating it's utility. The part you mentioned about being able to operate it with gloves on really resonated with me and I think with most people at Michigan it makes a lot of sense.
In terms of improvement, I would suggest that your comparison isn't limited to the iPhone. Maybe you could discuss how it compares to the Zune, but other than that I think this is a fantastic product if you're on a budget.
The mentioning of functionality in the beginning along side the clear criticism/bias against more popular mp3 players kept my attention. The weighing of pro's and cons made the review relevant and helpful. However, why are you reviewing a practical solution for students that is no longer in production?
Post a Comment